| Broadcast
1197 (Special Edition) |
Listen
to the show! |
| Aired on July 27th,
2009
|
| Guest: Dr.
Paul D. Spudis |
| Guest: Dr. Paul
Spudis. Topics: Return to the Moon, VSE Mission Statement,
lunar science, NASA, Mars, U.S. public and space exploration.
Dr. Paul Spudis returned for this special two hour program to
discuss why we should return to the Moon. In Segment 1, Dr.
Spudis talked about the Moon as a transitioning resource and
our training ground for how we can learn to live and settle in
space. He said that the way the VSE has evolved, its gotten
away from the true mission of our return to the Moon. This is
a discussion that you must hear and its repeated throughout
this two hour show. He said NASA does not actually have a
Mission Statement for returning to the Moon. Briefly, his
mission statement said that we would be going to the Moon to
learn the skills and technology to live and work on another
world. His full mission statement is near the end of this
initial program segment. When asked about going to a NEO or
Mars and bypassing the Moon, he talked about our need to learn
to do ISRU and that going to Mars now would be end to end, no
ISRU. A NEO would also be no ISRU. He said that he thought
NASA might be reluctant to find out how to live and work on
another world. Again, this is a very interesting discussion
and Dr. Spudis raised some questions that not only deserve our
consideration but also answers. Toward the end of this
segment, a question came in regarding how much of the general
population needed to be onboard in supporting returning to the
Moon. He referenced polls taken when he was part of the
Aldrich Commission that show about 50% of the population
mildly supports space and about 50% slightly disapproves of
it. Thus, the public is indifferent. With an indifferent
public, creating missions to inspire are not relevant. Doing
missions that inspire are relevant. This is another discussion
you do not want to miss. In Segment 2, Dr. Spudis clarified
and summarized the poll referred to at the end of the first
segment. He also talked about making space routine, not making
it stand out as something special. I asked Dr. Spudis to tell
us what lunar science could be done on the Moon and what type
of scientific projects the lunar scientists would like were
they totally funded and their wish lists could be honored. Dr.
Spudis mentioned several scientific projects but he pointed us
toward Lunar
Exploration Analysis Group website. Here you will find the
scientific projects to be undertaken that Dr. Spudis
mentioned. Another question that I asked on behalf of a
listener was why our Moon did not have a name such as the
moons of other planets. As we learned, our Moon does have a
name, Luna. That said, we prefer to use the Germanic
translation Moon in English but in other languages the Moon is
referred to by its name, Luna. Dr. Spudis also talked about
supporting the lunar mission that he described in the first
segment and he explained how support for that mission
ultimately supports carrying out lunar science. In Segment 3,
we started out discussing the two radar experiments Dr. Spudis
has going on around the Moon at this time. The first is on the
Indian Chandrayaan-1 satellite orbiting and photographing the
Moon. This radar experiment is looking for water ice and can
look down into deep, dark places for quality imaging. I asked
him if he had ITAR issues with this project and you need to
hear what he said about the ITAR compliance effort. It took a
year, was extremely costly and ultimately Dr. Griffin had to
go to India to speak with his counter part at the Indian Space
Research Organization (ISRO) to get the job done. The second
radar is on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and is a
more advanced radar imaging system. He talked about doing
bistatic imaging for finding ice. He explained how the orbits
of Chandrayaan and LRO come close at intersecting points, they
figure those points out and they are then able to do the
bistatic imaging with radars from both satellites. As this
segment progressed, we talked about the Apollo history and
even the Moon hoaxers. Dr. Spudis raised some good points in
that why should we know all the moonwalking astronauts. This
is another conversation you will want to hear. Paul was asked
if the NASA budget were doubled or even tripled could we get
to Mars much faster than the decades out goal of humans to
Mars that exists now. He said we would simply have more and
more viewgraphs! You need to hear this discussion and his full
range of comments on it. In summary, more money does not
shorten the learning curve for going to Mars! In Segment 4,
our final segment, we started out by talking about the levels
of risk at NASA and in our society and mission risk
assessment. In response to the question about how to reduce
the risk aversion, he indicated it was very hard to do and not
sure it could be done in our culture of today. He cited some
of the conclusions and comments surrounding lunar dust
problems as an example. Given his earlier statements that it
just might be that NASA does not really want to return to the
Moon, he was asked if the Ares 1 was a deliberate problematic
rocket designed to never enable the lunar return mission. He
said no but you will want to hear his full answer to this
question. We talked about SSP on the Moon and he thought it
possible with many caveats and the need for much technology
advancement. He outlined an incremental development plan that
would make projects like lunar SSP doable along with
fulfilling the mission statement he talked about in the first
segment of today's program. Toward the end of the program, he
was asked what he thought we should do with the shuttle and
the ISS. As for the shuttle, he favored its retirement for
safety reasons. As for ISS, he wanted to fully use it get the
real value of the station. He talked about using ISS as a
staging area for developing bigger systems and more
technology. He directed us to a paper he recently wrote with
Dennis Wingo and Gordon Woodcock, "Going
Beyond The Status Quo In Space.". To learn more about
Dr. Paul Spudis, please visit his website at www.spudislunarresources.com.
You can read his blog at Air
and Space magazine. If you have a question or comment for
Dr. Paul Spudis, please email him at spudis@lpi.usra.edu. In
addition, the Power Point presentation referenced during the
show, "The
Moon and The Vision For Space Exploration by Dr. Spudis
can be found at his web site. |
| About our guest... |
|
Dr. Paul
D. Spudis
Dr. Paul D. Spudis is a geologist specializing in research on
the processes of impact and volcanism on the planets. Served
on NASA’s Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST), which
advises allocations of lunar samples for scientific research,
the Lunar Exploration Science Working Group (LEXSWG),that
devised scientific strategies of lunar exploration, and the
Planetary Geology Working Group, which monitors overall
directions in the planetary research community. Served on the
Committee for Planetary and Lunar Exploration (COMPLEX), an
advisory committee of the National Academy of Sciences, and
the Synthesis Group, a White House panel that in 1990-1991,
analyzed a return to the Moon to establish a base and the
first human mission to Mars. Member, Presidential Commission
on the Implementation of U.S. Space Exploration Policy, 2004.
Deputy Leader of the Science Team for the Department of
Defense Clementine mission to the Moon in 1994. Principal
Investigator, Mini-SAR experiment on Indian Chandrayaan-1
mission to the Moon, 2008. Team member, Mini-RF technology
demonstration experiment, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission
to the Moon, 2008.
|
|